|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
April 20, 2021
TRUENEWSREPORT
By: NATHANIEL BALLANTYNE
TRUENEWSBLOG – Four drugmakers helped cause the deadly U.S. opioid epidemic by deceptively marketing their drugs and downplaying their addictive risks, a lawyer for several California counties argued on Monday at the start of a multibillion-dollar trial.
Those counties accuse Johnson & Johnson, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Endo International Plc and AbbVie Inc’s Allergan unit of fueling a drug crisis that according to the U.S. government resulted in nearly 500,000 opioid overdose deaths over two decades.
The populous Santa Clara, Los Angeles and Orange counties and the city of Oakland say that should a judge following the non-jury, virtual trial find the drugmakers liable, they should have to pay more than $50 billion to cover the costs of abating the public nuisance they created.
The plaintiffs’ lawyer, Fidelma Fitzpatrick, told Orange County Superior Court Judge Peter Wilson that the case was about the companies’ “deadly legacy” of promoting opioid painkillers to treat chronic pain, resulting in a “mountain” of addictive pills flooding the state and country.
“The evidence will show each of these companies, all of them, knew what would happen: that their opioids would cause the crushing burden of addiction, overdose and death that California and its people have experienced,” she said.
Defense lawyers countered that their drugs were a small part of the overall opioid market, that doctors were warned of their risks and that the counties could not prove they caused the health crisis.
“You won’t hear from a single doctor who was ever misled,” Collie James, Teva’s lawyer.
Fidelma Fitzpatrick, a lawyer for several large California counties at the law firm Motley Rice, presents her opening statement at the start of a non-jury trial being conducted by Zoom in Orange County Superior Court in a lawsuit accusing four drugmakers of fueling the opioid epidemic April 19, 2021 in a still image from video. Orange County Superior Court/Handout via REUTERS.
Mike Yoder, J&J’s lawyer, said its painkillers, which it no longer markets, were rarely abused. “They did not cause any opioid crisis, and they did not cause any public nuisance,” he said.
John Hueston, Endo’s lawyer, said the California communities were litigating over a handful of “innocuous statements” the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved.
“That’s game over,” he said. “Under the law, whatever the FDA says was gospel.”
More than 3,300 similar lawsuits are pending nationally over the opioid crisis. The only other case to go to trial in the opioid litigation resulted in the state of Oklahoma in 2019 winning a $465 million judgment against J&J, which is appealing.
Other cases are slated to go to trial in the coming months, creating new pressure for the companies to reach settlements.
The nation’s three largest drug distributors – McKesson Corp, AmerisourceBergen Corp and Cardinal Health Inc – and J&J have proposed paying a combined $26 billion to resolve the cases against them. The proposed deal has not been finalized.
